جدید مفسرین و متکلمین کی خیر و شر سے متعلق آراء کا تقابل

Comparison of the Opinions of Modern Exegists and Theologians Regarding Good and evil

Authors

  • Syeda Ayesha Rizvi PhD Institute of Islamic Studies , Punjab University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Dr. Sabeen Akbar Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, BUITEMS, AirPort Road Quetta

Keywords:

Traditional exegists, Modern exegists, exegesis, Mawlānā Abu al-Kalām Āzād, Amīn Aḥsan Iṣlāḥī, Abdul Ḥaq Ḥaqqānī

Abstract

Like the traditional exegists, many modern exegists have also incorporated the discussions of good and evil into their exegesis. Among them we chose three commentators: Mawlānā Abu al-Kalām Āzād, Amin Ahsan Işlāhī and Abdul Haq Haqqanī. The discussions related to good and bad will be explained in this chapter with the interpretations of these three exegists. These three exegists are widely accepted among scholars, they have presented valuable scholarly studies on their topics. Based on the acceptance of these exegesis among the scholars and their valuable discussions, we will present the discussions of good and bad among them which are as follows.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-17

How to Cite

Syeda Ayesha Rizvi, & Dr. Sabeen Akbar. (2023). جدید مفسرین و متکلمین کی خیر و شر سے متعلق آراء کا تقابل: Comparison of the Opinions of Modern Exegists and Theologians Regarding Good and evil. Jihat-ul-islam, 16(2), 186–204. Retrieved from https://jihat-ul-islam.com.pk/journal/index.php/jihat-ul-islam/article/view/599

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.